Competitively Priced Hydraulic Sim Racing Pedals! (Review)

These are the Conspit CPP Lite and CPP EVO hydraulic sim racing pedals, and I can confidently say you’ll want to know about them. Made by Conspit, a relatively new and lesser-known company in the sim racing world, these pedals—along with their other offerings, some of which I have now and others I’ll review in the future—are of serious quality and pose a major threat to the existing offerings from Simagic, Moza, and Fanatec. How so? They’re hydraulic, professional-grade sim racing pedals offered at strikingly competitive price points. Prices vary between global distributors, but to give you an idea, the CPP Lite’s 3-pedal variant hovers around $600, and closer to $500 for just the brake and throttle. The higher-end EVO starts at $850 for all three pedals, or $750 without the clutch. While this is a steep price, you’re also getting a lot in return… let me explain.

Sent to me by Conspit for review, I’ve been testing both of these pedal sets for quite some time now, evaluating how they differ, how they feel, and, most importantly, how they perform. I can tell you right now, they’re both really good… but not without their downsides.

---

Pedal Bases

---

Starting with the pedal bases, you can immediately see the quality difference between the “Lite” and “Evo” versions. The Lite features subtle purple accents and is primarily made of hard plastic with some metallic reinforcement underneath. They don’t look bad at all and still held up well under hard braking. However, they do pale in comparison to the Evo’s fully metallic baseplate, gold accents, and slightly more adjustability.

In general, though, both pedal sets are fundamentally the same, with a very similar design, functionality, and performance. One of the most noteworthy aspects of both pedal sets lies underneath. Here you’ll find the control box, where each pedal is individually connected, including the small power cable for the rumble motors. Conspit has done an excellent job with cable management; once set up, each pedal set has only two visible cables running out—one USB and one power cord. All other cables are neatly out of sight, tucked under the baseplate. Overall, these are well-designed, visually appealing pedal plates with a significant quality difference but fundamentally the same core design.

---

Throttle Pedal

---

Moving on to the pedals, let’s start with the throttle. Both the CPP Evo and Lite versions feature the same rumble motor and similar design in terms of size and shape. Starting with the Lite, the quality here, especially for the lower-end option, is commendable. It’s made entirely of metal, comes with a long formula-style pedal face, and, despite its simple and minimalistic design, can be significantly adjusted without much hassle. The purple knob adjusts the spring preload, allowing for a softer or stiffer feel, and overall, there’s nothing to complain about. The feel is smooth, silent in operation, and extremely easy and precise to modulate. Both pedals are also fitted with a non-contact hall effect sensor, which is fast, accurate, and reliable.

A standout feature is the rumble motor. Fitted on both the Evo and Lite pedals, it can be set to indicate wheel spin, ABS activation, or any other function via SimHub, which truly enhances immersion. The Evo’s throttle pedal, visibly higher-end in quality and design, still maintains the same fundamental features and benefits as the Lite. Additionally, it includes a pedal travel adjustment knob on the back and a rounded pedal face for added comfort. Personally, I didn’t feel the need to adjust the pedal travel on either version, but for those who prefer a shorter or longer travel, the Evo version offers that option.

Overall, both throttle pedals perform excellently, feeling and functioning identically. That said, let’s move on to the clutch, a pedal that is significantly harder to master.

---

Clutch Pedal

---

Separated mainly by appearance, the two clutch pedals work, feel, and perform similarly. The top spring mechanism has four different levels of bite point force adjustment, while the one underneath controls the spring preload on both models. This design is similar to other clutch pedals on the market and performs very well. By default, the clutch pedals come with a subtle bite-point feel that felt natural and comfortable. This resistance and feedback made it easy for me to heel-toe downshift without being distracting, unlike the clutch in the Moza CRP2s I reviewed a few weeks ago.

Adjusting the preload resistance and bite-point settings can significantly change the feel, but I found the standard configuration to be optimal. In-game, the clutch pedal on both products performed smoothly, quickly, and accurately. There was no flex or unwanted movement, and the vibration motor added an extra layer of realism. In terms of build quality, it’s excellent, with the EVO pedals constructed from CNC aluminum alloy and the Lites from treated alloy.

The overall design of the clutch pedal is elevated on the high-end Evo version, featuring gold accents, a more pronounced base and pedal arm design, and a sturdier spring preload, which, though visually appealing, performed identically in my testing. Overall, I can confidently say that the clutch pedal on both the Lite and Evo versions is very good—something I can’t often say about other clutch pedals I’ve used.

---

Brake Pedal

---

Finishing off with the star of the show, the brake pedal will be, without a doubt, the main difference maker between these two pedalsets as well as their biggest selling point. On the higher end evo’s you’ll find more adjustability such as fine tuning on both the front and rear preload as well as additional included elastomers for some added adjustability.

On the Lite’s, you only get the front preload adjustment knob, something which for the most part was good enough for me, but may not be for those seeking a less dampened feel - something the Lite’s very much have. In this sense, when using the lites you do get that hydraulic sensor which feels realistic but did always give me a “spongy resistance” which I liked, but did take me a bit to get adjusted to.

This feeling is able to be mitigated more on the Evo’s which did feel more “springy” in a good way, and similar to the Cube Controls SP01’s which has a widely acknowledged excellent brake pedal. Overall, both of these hydraulic pedals despite their differences are very impressive and very much designed for the highest end sim racing enthusiasts.

The Evo’s 2nd generation hydraulic system paired with their added adjustability does have the leg up but even then, the one in the Lite is still extremely impressive and with its use of a hydraulic pressure sensor is easily the closest to real-life feel I’ve had with a set of sim racing pedals. Moreover, adding the rumble motors on top of this was an extremely neat feature which again, added that extra layer of immersion.

---

Conclusion

---

Overall, both the Conspit CPP Lite and CPP EVO hydraulic pedals deliver impressive performance and build quality, putting them in strong competition with established brands like Simagic, Moza, and Fanatec. The major differences between the two lie in materials and adjustability, with the EVO offering a more premium, fully metallic construction, additional tuning options, and a generally more refined feel.

That said, the CPP Lite pedals hold their ground remarkably well, offering high performance at a more affordable price. While the plastic base and limited adjustments might seem like drawbacks, they still manage to provide excellent responsiveness and feedback, especially for users seeking value without sacrificing too much quality. The inclusion of rumble motors and hydraulic brake systems in both versions makes them standouts for immersion and realism. For extreme sim racers, the EVO’s adjustability and refined build may suit your needs better. However, for those seeking solid hydraulic pedals at a lower price point, the CPP Lite is an excellent option that won’t disappoint.

Despite all these positives, I did note some drawbacks, primarily related to the software. While this may vary by user and will likely be resolved soon, at the time of recording, the Lites only worked with an older version of the Conspit software, while the EVOs required the newer version. Additionally, the Lite’s rumble motors didn’t function in iRacing but worked perfectly in ACC, whereas the EVOs worked seamlessly with both games. These issues are easy fixes and will likely be refined, but they were still somewhat frustrating.

Furthermore, I believe Conspit could enhance its product page to better convey the quality of these products. While they’re of high quality, the website’s unpolished appearance doesn’t communicate this. Also, purchasing these pedals is only possible through Conspit’s authorized global distributors (linked in the video description), and as of this recording, there are no distributors in the United States.

Other than these issues, these pedals are seriously impressive, competitive for their price points, and certainly worth your consideration, even in the rapidly evolving sim racing hardware market as we approach 2025.

---

---

---

CONSPIT CPP Lite and CPP EVO FAQ’s

What is the difference between the CPP Lite and CPP EVO pedals? The main differences lie in materials and adjustability. The CPP Lite features a durable plastic base and slightly limited adjustability, while the CPP EVO has a fully metallic construction, additional tuning options, and a more premium, refined feel.

How much do the CPP Lite and CPP EVO pedals cost? Prices vary depending on distributors, but generally, the CPP Lite’s 3-pedal variant is around $600, with the 2-pedal (brake and throttle) option around $500. The CPP EVO starts at $850 for all three pedals and around $750 for the brake and throttle setup.

Are these pedals compatible with all sim racing titles? Yes, the pedals are compatible with major sim racing titles, though some users may encounter minor software issues with certain games. For example, during testing, the Lite’s rumble motors didn’t work in iRacing but functioned well in ACC, while the EVO performed seamlessly in both.

Do the pedals work with SimHub for rumble feedback? Yes, both the Lite and EVO models have integrated rumble motors that can be configured in SimHub to signal events like wheel spin or ABS activation, adding an extra layer of immersion.

What materials are used in the construction of these pedals? The CPP Lite pedals are primarily made of high-quality plastic with some metal reinforcement, while the CPP EVO pedals are constructed entirely of CNC aluminum alloy, providing enhanced durability and a more premium feel.

Can the pedals be adjusted? Yes, both models allow for spring preload adjustments and, in the case of the clutch, bite point adjustments. The EVO model offers additional pedal travel adjustments and a rounded pedal face on the throttle for added comfort.

How is cable management handled in these pedals? Conspit designed the pedals with cable management in mind. Both models have a control box under the base where each pedal plugs in, and once set up, only two cables (USB and power) are visible, making for a cleaner setup.

What are the standout features of these pedals? The standout features include hydraulic braking systems, high-quality construction, integrated rumble motors for enhanced immersion, and options for spring preload and bite point adjustments. Both models provide smooth, responsive, and realistic feedback.

Are there any drawbacks to consider? The primary drawbacks are related to software compatibility, which may require some troubleshooting depending on the version used. Additionally, the Lite’s plastic base is less premium than the EVO’s metal construction, though it still performs well for its price point.